Mike Pence to launch 2024 presidential campaign in Iowa

NEW YORK — Former Vice President Mike Pence will officially launch his campaign for the Republican nomination for president in Iowa next week, putting him in direct competition with his former boss.

Pence will hold a kickoff event in Des Moines on June 7, the date of his 64th birthday, according to two people familiar with his plans who spoke on condition of anonymity to share details ahead of the official announcement. He is also expected to release a video message as part of the launch.

His team sees early-voting Iowa as critical to his potential path to victory and advisers say he plans to campaign aggressively for the conservative, evangelical Christian voters who make up a substantial portion of the state’s Republican electorate. Pence is an avowed social conservative and is staunchly opposed to abortion rights, favoring a national ban.

The campaign is expected to lean heavily on town halls and retail stops aimed at showcasing Pence’s personality as he tries to emerge from former President Donald Trump’s shadow.

Pence, who served in Congress and as Indiana’s governor before he was tapped as Trump’s running mate in 2016, had been an exceedingly loyal vice president until he broke with Trump over the 2020 election.

Trump, desperate to overturn his loss and remain in power, had tried to convince Pence — and his supporters — that Pence could somehow reject voters’ will as he presided over the ceremonial counting of the electoral college votes on Jan. 6, 2021, even though the vice president has no such power. As the count was underway, a violent mob of Trump’s supporters stormed the building, smashing through windows, assailing police and sending Pence, his family and his staff, racing for cover as members of the mob chanted “Hang Mike Pence!”

Pence has said Trump’s “reckless words” endangered his family and everyone else who was at the Capitol that day. He has said “history will hold Donald Trump accountable.”

“For four years, we had a close working relationship. It did not end well,” Pence wrote in his book, “So Help Me God.”

Pence has spent the two-and-a-half years since then strategically distancing himself from Trump as he has laid the groundwork for the campaign. While he consistently praises the record of the “Trump-Pence administration,” he has also stressed differences between the two men, on both policy and style.

He has called on his party to move on from Trump’s election grievances and warned against the growing tide of populism in the Republican Party. He admonished “Putin apologists” unwilling to stand up to the Russian leader over his assault on Ukraine in response to comments from Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is running a distant second to Trump in the polls.

He has also argued in favor of reforms to programs like Social Security and Medicare — which both Trump and DeSantis have vowed not to touch — and criticized DeSantis for his escalating feud with Disney.

Pence also testified last month before a federal grand jury investigating efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the results of the 2020 election. He has spent months visiting early-voting states, delivering policy speeches, speaking at churches and courting donors ahead of his expected run.

The week will be a busy one for GOP announcements. Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is planning to launch his campaign Tuesday evening at a town hall event in New Hampshire and North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum will announce on June 7 in Fargo.

Pelosi rules out creation of Jan. 6 commission

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is ruling out a presidential commission to study the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, telling House Democrats on Tuesday that having President Joe Biden appoint a panel is unworkable even after the Senate blocked an independent probe last week. 

Pelosi laid out possible next steps after Friday’s Senate vote, in which Senate Republicans blocked legislation to create an independent, bipartisan panel to investigate the siege by former President Donald Trump’s supporters. She proposed four options for an investigation of the attack, according to a person on the private Democratic caucus call who spoke on condition of anonymity. 

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer speaks to reporters after final votes going into the Memorial Day recess, at the Capitol May 28, 2021. (J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/Associated Press)

The first option, Pelosi said, is to give the Senate another chance to vote on the commission, which would be modeled after a highly respected panel that investigated the 9/11 terrorist attacks. 

The other options involve the House investigating the attack, meaning the probes would be inherently partisan. Pelosi suggested that she could appoint a new select committee or give the responsibility to a single committee. The fourth option would be for committees to simply push ahead with their own investigations that are already underway.

But the speaker said she believed a commission appointed by Biden — an idea pitched by some in her caucus after Friday’s Senate vote — was “not a workable idea in this circumstance” because Congress would still need to approve money and subpoena authority for the panel. 

The White House has not yet said whether Biden would try to appoint a commission without Congress. On Friday, White House deputy press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters that “the president has been clear that the shameful events of Jan. 6 need to be independently and fully investigated” and that he remains committed to that. 

Facebook employees protest decision to keep Trump posts

OAKLAND, Calif.  — Facebook employees are using Twitter to air their frustration over CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to leave up President Donald Trump’s posts, which suggested protesters in Minneapolis could be shot.

While Twitter demoted and placed a warning on a tweet about the protests that read, in part, “when the looting starts the shooting starts,” Facebook has let it stand, with Zuckerberg laying out his reasoning in a post Friday.

“I know many people are upset that we’ve left the President’s posts up, but our position is that we should enable as much expression as possible unless it will cause imminent risk of specific harms or dangers spelled out in clear policies,” Zuckerberg wrote.

Trump’s comment evoked the civil-rights era by borrowing a phrase used in 1967 by Miami’s police chief to warn of an aggressive police response to unrest in black neighborhoods.

On Monday, Facebook employees staged a virtual “walkout” to protest the company’s hands-off approach to the Trump posts, according to a report in the New York Times, which cited anonymous senior employees at Facebook. The Times report says “dozens” of Facebook workers “took the day off by logging into Facebook’s systems and requesting time off to support protesters across the country.”


“I work at Facebook and I am not proud of how we’re showing up. The majority of co-workers I’ve spoken to feel the same way. We are making our voice heard,” tweeted Jason Toff, a longtime director of product management at Facebook.

Toff, who has a verified Twitter account, had 131,400 “likes” and thousands of retweets of his comment. He did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment on Monday.

“I don’t know what to do, but I know doing nothing is not acceptable. I’m a FB employee that completely disagrees with Mark’s decision to do nothing about Trump’s recent posts, which clearly incite violence. I’m not alone inside of FB. There isn’t a neutral position on racism,” Jason Stirman, design manager, tweeted.

Stirman did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday.

Sara Zhang, product designer at the company, tweeted that Facebook’s “decision to not act on posts that incite violence ignores other options to keep our community safe. The policy pigeon holes us into addressing harmful user-facing content in two ways: keep content up or take it down.”

“I believe that this is a self-imposed constraint and implore leadership to revisit the solution,” she continued.


Zhang declined to comment to The Associated Press.

Representatives for Facebook did not immediately respond to multiple requests for comment Monday.

Late Sunday, Zuckerberg again posted on Facebook, pledging a $10 million donation to racial justice groups. But he made no mention of Trump’s posts. Instead, he highlighted Facebook’s role in spreading the video of George Floyd’s death.

Floyd, a black man who was in handcuffs at the time, died after a white police officer ignored bystander shouts to get off him and Floyd’s cries that he couldn’t breathe. His death, captured on citizen video, sparked protests in Minneapolis that have spread to cities around America.

“We need to know George Floyd’s name. But it’s clear Facebook also has more work to do to keep people safe and ensure our systems don’t amplify bias,” Zuckerberg wrote.

Twitter has historically taken stronger stances than its larger rival, including a complete ban on political advertisements that the company announced last November.

In contrast, Facebook is targeted by regulators over its size and power and consequently has more to lose. Further complicating matters, the companies’ CEOs don’t always see eye to eye on their platform’s role in society.

Anti-abortion activists undeterred by Jane Roe documentary

NEW YORK — Norma McCorvey’s admission that her conversion from the face of abortion rights — as the “Jane Roe” of the historic 1973 Supreme Court case — to an opponent of the practice came with payments from anti-abortion activists might seem to be a blow to their movement.

But the revelations McCorvey offered in the recently premiered documentary “AKA Jane Roe” stand little chance of denting anti-abortion activists’ momentum in Washington.

In fact, leading religious conservatives and some of their critics agree that the anti-abortion alliance of Catholics and evangelicals has come to wield outsized political influence, thanks to their close ties to President Donald Trump’s administration.

Anti-abortion activists are largely dismissing McCorvey’s on-camera “deathbed confession” about the authenticity of her work on their behalf. Pointing to the complexity of McCorvey’s personality and her beliefs, abortion opponents contend that the new film misrepresents her genuine qualms about terminating pregnancies.

The Rev. Frank Pavone, leader of Priests for Life and a prominent Catholic Trump supporter, grew close to McCorvey during her transition to Christianity as she became an anti-abortion advocate in 1995. Pavone said McCorvey’s “burden of pain” from her involvement in the Roe v. Wade decision was unquestionably real, despite her tendency to air blunt grievances and say “things that make her seem like two different people.”

“If she was making up her regret, what we witnessed and what we went through with her would have been impossible,” Pavone said.

He was among more than two dozen anti-abortion activists who last week wrote to the chairman of FX Entertainment and the film’s director, taking issue with its depiction of McCorvey as a feigned convert to their side. Their letter asserts that their movement is making headway against abortion rights, prompting counterefforts by abortion supporters.

Indeed, a major test in the nation’s decades-long battle over abortion is set to come by the end of June, when the Supreme Court is expected to issue its first major ruling on an abortion case since the addition of two justices appointed by Trump — Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.

Anti-abortion groups and the Trump administration hope the court will signal its willingness to weaken protections for abortion by upholding a Louisiana law that would require doctors at abortion clinics to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

No matter the outcome of the upcoming case, the negative effect of the McCorvey documentary has been minimal compared with the victories notched by anti-abortion activists under Trump.

Rev. Robert Jeffress, pastor of the Southern Baptist megachurch First Baptist Dallas and a frequent guest at the White House, echoed fellow abortion opponents in describing Trump as “the most pro-life president in history.”

Jeffress stressed the significance of Trump’s judicial appointments — scores of new federal judges believed to be open to reconsidering the Roe decision.

“The president has understood that the real power for the pro-life movement is the judiciary,” Jeffress said.

Even some who have critically eyed conservative anti-abortion groups’ growing influence said the McCorvey film would likely not deal their advocacy a lasting blow.

John Gehring, Catholic program director at the liberal-leaning group Faith in Public Life, said anti-abortion advocates “have reached a high-water mark in their ability to have the ear of the most powerful person in the world,” referring to Trump — though he warned that alliance “has serious long-term consequences for the moral viability of the movement.”

Katherine Stewart, a journalist who wrote a book about American religious nationalism, sounded a similar note.

“Movement leaders made peace with supporting Donald Trump — pretty much the paragon of anti-family values — so one should expect that they will make peace with whatever revelations this film offers on the rather smaller potato of Norma McCorvey,” Stewart said by email.

The film shows McCorvey, shortly before her 2017 death at age 69, saying she took money from anti-abortion groups “and they put me out in front of the cameras and told me what to say.” Both Pavone and the Rev. Rob Schenck, a prominent evangelical and former anti-abortion activist, described some of that compensation as indirect rather than a specific payment to leave the abortion-rights camp.

In this photo taken April 26, 1989, Norma McCorvey (“Jane Roe”), left, and her attorney Gloria Allred hold hands as they leave the Supreme Court building in Washington after sitting in while the court listened to arguments in a Missouri abortion case. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

“In a movement, and especially in the Christian evangelical side of the movement, it’s only seen as right to take care of people financially,” said Schenck, who now supports the Roe decision.

McCorvey quips in the documentary, “I am a good actress.” But Schenck, who worked with her following her anti-abortion shift, said, “I never felt like I was paying an actress” even though he did worry at times that McCorvey felt neglected enough by anti-abortion groups to consider switching sides.

Trump has rallied behind anti-abortion groups’ goals as he works to lock in conservative religious voters, an effort Pavone is assisting as an adviser to the president’s Catholic outreach project. The priest, who spoke at McCorvey’s funeral, said the film could ultimately benefit anti-abortion activists by showcasing little-known details about her life.

“The only way we don’t make progress is when people aren’t talking about these things at all,” Pavone said. “Once you start wrestling with them … we end up advancing in the end.”

___

Associated Press religion coverage receives support from the Lilly Endowment through the Religion News Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

Merkel won’t attend G7 summit in person if US goes ahead

BERLIN — Chancellor Angela Merkel will not attend an in-person meeting in the U.S. with the leaders of the world’s major economies if President Donald Trump goes ahead with it, unless the course of the coronavirus spread changes by then, her office said Saturday.

After canceling the Group of Seven summit, originally scheduled for June 10 to 12 at Camp David, Trump said a week ago that he was again considering hosting an in-person meeting of world leaders because it would be a “great sign to all” of things returning to normal during the pandemic.

Immediately after that announcement, Merkel suggested she had not yet made up her mind on whether to attend in person or by videoconference, but her office told the DPA news agency she has now made a decision.

“As of today, given the overall pandemic situation, she cannot commit to participating in person,” her office said. It added that the chancellor would continue to monitor the coronavirus situation in case things change.

Historic cemetery won’t be site for wall, Border Protection says

HOUSTON — The U.S. government said Monday that it won’t build President Donald Trump’s border wall on the site of a historic cemetery that might have required the exhumation of graves.

In a statement, U.S. Customs and Border Protection said it would “avoid” the Eli Jackson Cemetery in South Texas’ Rio Grande Valley while “still meeting Border Patrol’s operational requirements for [a] border wall.”

“It has never been CBP’s intent to disturb or relocate cemeteries that may lie within planned barrier alignment,” the agency said. “Understanding the historical and cultural resources that may lie within planned barrier alignment has always been part of CBP’s public and stakeholder outreach process.”

[related title=”Related Stories” stories=”9610,6650,6392″ align=”left” background=”off” border=”none” shadow=”off”]

CBP issued the statement in response to an Associated Press story about the cemetery, one of two 19th century burial sites established by Nathaniel Jackson’s sons.

Jackson settled along the Rio Grande in 1857, nine years after the river became the U.S.-Mexico border following the Mexican-American War.

Congress has already funded construction in much of the Rio Grande Valley, where the government says it needs additional barriers to stop human and drug smuggling. Due to flooding concerns and land rights, much of the wall in the region would be built well north of the river and still leave area for people crossing illegally to reach the United States.

Jackson’s descendants have sued the government and led a campaign to stop construction at the sites.

“It’s a very good day for us as it relates to the Eli Jackson cemetery,” said Sylvia Ramirez, one of Jackson’s descendants who has helped lead her family’s opposition to the wall.

Ramirez has previously met with Border Patrol agents, who she said indicated they would take her family’s concerns into account, but never directly promised that the wall wouldn’t be built on the cemetery.

But Ramirez added that CBP’s statement “doesn’t answer all our questions by any means.” She said she wanted to know if the family’s other burial site, the Jackson Ranch cemetery, would be protected as well. She was also concerned CBP might still seek to build a wall nearby, which could still cause flooding or environmental damage.

“There are less destructive ways for the government to meet its security goals,” she said.

BREAKING: Judge rejects Congress’ challenge of border wall funding

WASHINGTON — A federal judge has denied a request by the House to prevent President Donald Trump from tapping Defense Department money for his proposed border wall with Mexico.

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden ruled Monday that the House didn’t have authority to sue over the president’s decision to rely on Pentagon money for wall construction. McFadden is a Trump appointee.

Trump’s victory is muted by a federal ruling in California last month that blocked construction of key sections of the wall. The California case was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition.

The judge in the California case, Haywood Gilliam Jr., is an appointee of President Barack Obama. The administration plans to appeal.

US-China trade war shakes business confidence across Asia

BEIJING – A report Monday on Chinese manufacturing suggested that Beijing’s trade war with the Trump administration is causing domestic economic damage.

Surveys of manufacturers across Asia for May showed that business confidence has been shaken by the conflict over President Donald Trump’s demands that Beijing change its industrial planning strategy and find other ways to redress its perennially huge trade surpluses.

But in a move that could ratchet back tensions, the world’s largest association of technology professionals said it is lifting a research cooperation restriction it had imposed on employees of Chinese tech giant Huawei.

A private survey, the Caixin manufacturing purchasing managers’ index, for China held steady at 50.2 in May, just above the 50 level that distinguishes between expansion and contraction. But business confidence slipped to its lowest level since the series began in April 2012. The official manufacturing PMI, issued Friday, sank to one of the lowest levels in three years.

China showed no signs of budging over the Trump administration’s demands. It issued a report over the weekend saying it would not back down on “major issues of principle.” It said Beijing had kept its word through 11 rounds of trade negotiations and accused Washington of backtracking by introducing new tariffs and other conditions beyond what those agreed to.

Most of Trump’s ire over trade has been directed at China, given its lion-sized importance to global manufacturing and its growing technological prowess.

But last week the president heaped more uncertainty on global financial markets and investors by saying he would impose 5% tariffs on Mexican imports starting June 10 if the Mexicans don’t stop the surge of Central American migrants across the southern U.S. border.

That would be a blow to some manufacturers that use Mexico as production bases, such as automakers.

Meanwhile, the world’s largest grouping of technology professionals, IEEE, reversed itself on a restriction that Huawei employees no longer be permitted to peer review or edit articles published in its journals. The restriction had prompted backlash among Chinese members of the 420,000-member organization, with some declaring they would quit.

Huawei has borne the brunt of U.S. castigation in the U.S.-China trade dispute as an alleged national security risk, with the U.S. Commerce Department blacklisting it in mid-May, effectively barring U.S. firms from selling or transferring technology to it.

The IEEE restriction turned out to be an overly cautious response to the blacklisting, according to a statement published on its website Sunday, and was dropped after “requested clarification” from the Commerce Department.

“Our initial, more restrictive approach was motivated solely by our desire to protect our volunteers and our members from legal risk,” the statement said.

IEEE, which stands for the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, was among several leading U.S.-based global technology standards-setting groups that imposed restrictions on Huawei participation in their activities, including the Wi-Fi Alliance and the SD Association.

Huawei, the world’s biggest maker of telecom gear and No. 2 smartphone manufacturer, said Monday that it had no comment on the announcement.

Zhang Haixia, a nanotechnology scientist at Peking University, said she would rejoin the organization after having resigned from two IEEE boards last week.

“This is a moment that we, the academic community, should be proud of,” Zhang wrote in a social media post Monday. “Let’s work to make IEEE, an international academic community, great again.”

The New Jersey-based IEEE is a leading developer of telecommunications, information technology and power generation standards. It has members in more than 160 countries and puts out about 200 different publications.

On Sunday, Wang Shouwen, China’s vice commerce minister and deputy international trade representative, told reporters in Beijing that China would issue details about its own list of “unreliable entities” soon.

Wang said the list, originally announced Friday by a department spokesman, would be aimed at enterprises that “violated market principles” and that cut supplies of components to Chinese businesses for non-commercial reasons. He reiterated suggestions that China might limit exports of rare earths, minerals such as lithium that are used in many products including cell phones, electric vehicles and the batteries that run them.

[related title=”Related Stories” stories=”9225″ align=”left” background=”off” border=”none” shadow=”off”]

Day before state visit, Trump denies that he called Meghan Markle “nasty”

WASHINGTON — Like a bull who keeps returning to the china shop, President Donald Trump is headed back to Europe, where he has strained historic friendships and insulted his hosts on previous visits. This time, he faces an ally in turmoil and a global call to renew democratic pacts. British Prime Minister Theresa May will step down days after Trump visits and French President Emmanuel Macron is expected to use the 75th anniversary of the World War II battle that turned the tide in Europe to call for strengthening the multinational ties the U.S. president has frayed.

THE AGENDA

Trump is to arrive in London on June 3 for a two-day whirlwind of pomp, circumstance and protests, including meetings with the royal family and an extravagant state dinner at Buckingham Palace. He is likely to be shadowed by demonstrators, who during his visit to England last summer flooded the streets and flew an inflatable balloon depicting the president as a baby.

The agenda for Trump’s weeklong journey is both ceremonial and official: a state visit and an audience with Queen Elizabeth II in London, D-Day commemoration ceremonies on both sides of the English Channel and his first presidential visit to Ireland, which will include a stay at his coastal golf club.

What should have been a routine visit with the Irish prime minister grew complicated due to the president’s unprecedented blending of government duties and business promotion. Trump will spend two nights at his club in Doonbeg, which sits above the Atlantic, and the White House originally insisted that he and his Irish counterpart meet there.

After Dublin balked, a deal was struck for Trump to meet Prime Minister Leo Varadkar at Shannon’s airport.

The centerpiece of the president’s visit will be two days to mark the D-Day anniversary, likely the last significant commemoration most veterans of the battle will see. The anniversary events will begin in Portsmouth, England, where the invasion was launched, and then move to Normandy, France, where Allied forces began to recapture Western Europe from the Nazis.

A “NASTY” VISIT

In an interview with The Sun newspaper, Trump weighed in on the American-born Duchess of Sussex. The former Meghan Markle, who gave birth in May and will not attend the week’s events, was critical of Trump in the past, prompting the president to tell The Sun, “I didn’t know that she was nasty.” He said later in the interview that he thought Markle would be “very good” as a royal.

Markle supported Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential candidate in 2016, calling Trump “divisive” and “misogynistic.”

Trump pushed back on Sunday against reports that he had described Markle as “nasty.” He tweeted that the media made up the reports. 

The Sun posted the audio of the interview on its website.

China blames US for trade dispute, says it won’t back down

BEIJING — China issued a report Sunday blaming the United States for the countries’ trade dispute and said it won’t back down on “major issues of principle,” but offered no clarification about what additional steps it might take to up the ante.

The report from the Cabinet spokesman’s office said China has kept its word throughout 11 rounds of talks and will honor its commitments if a trade agreement is reached. It accused the U.S. of backtracking three times over the course of the talks by introducing new tariffs and other conditions beyond what was agreed on.

“But the more the U.S. government is offered, the more it wants,” it said, accusing America’s negotiators of “resorting to intimidation and coercion.”

“A country’s sovereignty and dignity must be respected, and any agreement reached by the two sides must be based on equality and mutual benefit,” the report said.

The report, delivered at a Sunday morning news conference, appears to be a bid to shore up China’s arguments and justify its position in the face of what looks to be a protracted dispute. Over recent days, China has been mobilizing its representatives abroad to sell its position with foreign audiences, while the domestic propaganda apparatus has been working overtime to convince the public of the righteousness of the government’s stance.

Linda Lim, a professor at Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan, said the report does not represent an escalation on China’s part, but rather reiterates the government’s position in a clear and measured way that leaves the door open for negotiations.

“They threw the ball back into the U.S. court,” she said.

She said the report is a public relations win for China’s government at a time when U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade policy is antagonizing other U.S. trading partners, most recently Mexico. Trump announced last week that he would impose 5% tariffs on Mexican imports starting June 10 if the Mexicans don’t do more to stop the surge of Central American migrants across the southern U.S. border.

The U.S. has accused China of stealing trade secrets and forced technology transfers. The Trump administration has imposed 25% tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese imports and is planning to tax the $300 billion in imports that have so far been spared. It also escalated the stakes this month by putting Chinese telecom giant Huawei on a blacklist that effectively bars U.S. companies from supplying it with computer chips, software and other components without government approval.

Beijing responded by imposing tariffs on $60 billion worth of U.S. products, which went into effect Saturday. It also retaliated against the U.S. blacklisting of Huawei by announcing Friday that it will establish its own list of “unreliable entities” consisting of foreign businesses, corporations and individuals.

Wang Shouwen, China’s vice commerce minister and deputy international trade representative, said China would issue more detailed information on the unreliable entities list soon, but that it was aimed at enterprises that “violated market principles” and cut supplies of components to Chinese businesses for non-commercial reasons.

China’s statement that it intends to publish such a list follows additional measures last week that deepened the bite of U.S. sanctions imposed on Huawei in mid-May.

Several leading U.S.-based global technology standards-setting groups announced restrictions on Huawei’s participation in their activities under U.S. Commerce Department rules that bar the sale and transfer of U.S. technology to Huawei without government approval.

Wang also repeated suggestions that China could restrict the export of exotic minerals known as rare earths that are widely used in electric cars and cellphones. Foremost among them is lithium, the main component in modern batteries.

The threat to use China’s rich supply of rare earths as leverage in the conflict has contributed to sharp losses in U.S. stocks and sliding long-term bond yields.

“If some countries use China’s rare earth metals to produce products to contain China’s development, this is unacceptable by standards of both minds and hearts,” Wang said.

Sunday’s report lays out China’s argument for blaming Washington for the frictions as well as the costs to both sides, and said China has room for fiscal policy changes to maintain the health of its economy amid the dispute.

Wang said China had been forced to “take forceful measures in response” to U.S. actions and denied China had backtracked on its earlier commitments.

He said the U.S. had made unacceptable demands, including on tariffs and compulsory requirements that infringed on Chinese sovereignty. “You give them an inch, they take a yard,” he said.

Trump has touted the tariff increases as a way of reducing China’s trade surplus with the U.S., which hit a staggering $379 billion last year. However, Wang questioned how much China was actually benefiting from its surplus, saying a joint Chinese-U.S. study showed the U.S. figure could be inflated by as much as 20%.

He also said many of those exports were produced by foreign companies operating in China and that Chinese firms often pocketed only a relatively meager fee for assembling. Subtracting the U.S. surplus in the services trade with China, the actual surplus came to just $152.6 billion last year, Wang said.

The U.S. deficit with China has actually been worsening since tariffs were first imposed, Wang said, pointing to a 50% decline in soy bean exports to China and a drop-off in U.S. auto sales in the country. The average U.S. family, meanwhile, will pay an additional $831 for consumer items over the year due to the higher tariffs, he said, while the dispute’s impact on businesses could end up costing 2.23 million U.S. jobs overall.

“That shows that the deepening trade restrictions hurt U.S. workers,” Wang said.

Pentagon tells White House to stop politicizing military

SEOUL, South Korea — The Pentagon has told the White House to stop politicizing the military, amid a furor over a Trump administration order to have the Navy ship named for the late U.S. Sen. John McCain hidden from view during President Donald Trump’s recent visit to Japan.

Trump’s top aide scoffed at the idea that anyone working for the White House might be punished. “We think it’s much ado about nothing.”

A U.S. defense official said Patrick Shanahan, Trump’s acting defense chief, is also considering sending out formal guidance to military units in order to avoid similar problems in the future.

Shanahan confirmed details about a Navy email that said the White House military office wanted the USS John McCain kept “out of sight” when Trump was in Japan about a week ago. The internal Navy email came to light last week, triggering a storm of outrage.

Trump, who long feuded with McCain, has said he knew nothing about the request, but added that “somebody did it because they thought I didn’t like him, OK? And they were well-meaning, I will say.”

Shanahan told reporters traveling with him to South Korea on Sunday that he is not planning to seek an investigation by the Pentagon’s internal watchdog into the matter “because there was nothing carried out” by the Navy. He added that he still needs to gather more information about exactly what happened and what service members did.

“How did the people receiving the information — how did they treat it,” Shanahan said. “That would give me an understanding on the next steps” to take.

Shanahan did not detail what those steps could be, but a defense official said Shanahan is considering a clearer directive to the military about avoiding political situations. The goal would be to ensure there is less ambiguity about how the military should support VIP events and how service members should respond to such political requests, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

Shanahan also said that he spoke with McCain’s wife, Cindy, a few days ago. He declined to provide any details.

The order to keep the Navy destroyer out of sight reflected what appeared to be an extraordinary White House effort to avoid offending an unpredictable president known for holding a grudge, including a particularly bitter one against McCain.

Trump’s acting chief of staff, in appearances on two Sunday news shows in the U.S., said he did not expect anyone working for the White House to face discipline. “To think that you’re going to get fired over this is silly,” said Mick Mulvaney, making the comparison to someone who tries to sit bickering colleagues apart from each other at an office meeting.

“The fact that some 23- or 24-year-old person on the advance team went to that site and said ‘Oh my goodness, there’s the John McCain, we all know how the president feels about the former senator, maybe that’s not the best backdrop, can somebody look into moving it?’ That’s not an unreasonable thing to ask,” Mulvaney said.

The McCain incident has dogged Shanahan throughout his weeklong trip to Asia, even as he tried to deal with critical national security issues involving the eroding U.S. relationship with China and the continuing threat from North Korea.

Shanahan, who has been serving in an acting capacity since the first of the year, has yet to be formally nominated by Trump as permanent defense chief. His speech to a major national security conference in Singapore on Saturday was a chance to audition for the job on the international stage.

A formal nomination has been expected, and Congress members have said they believe there will be a hearing on his nomination in the next month or so. The McCain issue is sure to come up, but it’s not clear how it may affect either his nomination or confirmation by the Senate. It may well depend on what steps he takes to respond to the matter in the coming days.

According to Shanahan spokesman Lt. Col. Joseph Buccino, Shanahan told his chief of staff on Friday to speak with the White House military office “and reaffirm his mandate that the department of defense will not be politicized.” Buccino said the chief of staff reported back that he delivered the message.

Asked what he has learned about the incident so far, Shanahan said he was told that despite the White House request, the Navy did not move the ship and that a barge that was in front of it was moved before Trump arrived. He said that a tarp that had been draped over the ship’s name was removed, but that it was put there for maintenance, not to obscure its identity.

Asked directly if members of his senior staff were aware of the White House request before the president’s visit, Shanahan said he’s been told they did not know. He also has said he was not aware of the request and that he would never have authorized it.

What is still unclear, however, is who at the Pentagon may have known about the request and either agreed with it or chose not to discourage it. It’s also not clear whether Navy leaders deliberately chose the McCain crew as one of the ships to be on holiday leave during Trump’s visit, or if other measures were taken to ensure that the McCain was not visible from where the president stood when he arrived on the USS Wasp to make remarks.

The warship, commissioned in 1994, was originally named for the senator’s father and grandfather, both Navy admirals named John Sidney McCain. Last year, the Navy rededicated the ship to honor the senator as well.

International briefs: Trudeau declines to meet Trump after Pence sets precondition

TORONTO — Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he offered to go to Washington this week to complete talks on renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement, but that Vice President Mike Pence told him a meeting with President Trump would only happen if Trudeau agreed to put a five-year sunset clause into the deal.

Trudeau said he refused to go because of the “totally unacceptable” precondition. He made the comment Thursday while outlining Canada’s response to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.

In a call to Trump May 25, Trudeau offered to meet Trump because he felt they were close to an agreement that only required a “final deal making moment.”

The prime minister also said Trump seemed agreeable before Pence called Trudeau on Tuesday.